mempool.ink

Eden Network vs MetaMask Smart Transactions

How Eden Network and MetaMask Smart Transactions differ on type, protection, rebates and what they’re built for.

Eden NetworkMetaMask Smart Transactions
TypePrivate RPCWallet feature
How it worksRoutes transactions through private lanes directly to block builders so they’re never exposed in the public mempool.Submits your tx to a private “virtual mempool” and auctions it to trusted builders who are financially penalized if they don’t execute at the quoted price. It stays private until confirmed.
Protects againstFrontrunning by bypassing the public mempoolFrontrunning + failed transactions (99.9% success rate)
RebatesNo standard user rebateNo direct rebate — back-run value funds the free service
ChainsEthereumEthereum, Linea, Base, Arbitrum, BNB Chain
SetupUse the Eden RPC endpointToggle on in MetaMask settings
Best forA simple direct-to-builder RPC swapMetaMask users who want zero setup

Eden Network

  • Direct-to-builder private lanes
  • Simple RPC swap
  • Long-running project
  • Lower momentum vs Flashbots/MEV Blocker today
  • No back-run rebate to users

MetaMask Smart Transactions

  • Zero setup — built into MetaMask
  • 99.9% tx success rate + pre-simulation
  • Multichain (ETH + 4 chains)
  • Only inside MetaMask
  • No direct rebate to you

Bottom line

Pick Eden Network for a simple direct-to-builder rpc swap; pick MetaMask Smart Transactions for metamask users who want zero setup.