mempool.ink

Merkle (Blink) vs MetaMask Smart Transactions

How Merkle (Blink) and MetaMask Smart Transactions differ on type, protection, rebates and what they’re built for.

Merkle (Blink)MetaMask Smart Transactions
TypePrivate RPCWallet feature
How it worksThe Merkle Private Pool routes order flow privately; “Blink” packages it as MEV protection that wallets and RPC providers can embed and monetize.Submits your tx to a private “virtual mempool” and auctions it to trusted builders who are financially penalized if they don’t execute at the quoted price. It stays private until confirmed.
Protects againstFrontrunning & sandwich attacksFrontrunning + failed transactions (99.9% success rate)
RebatesRevenue share for integrating walletsNo direct rebate — back-run value funds the free service
ChainsEthereum, BSC, Polygon, Base, Arbitrum, SolanaEthereum, Linea, Base, Arbitrum, BNB Chain
SetupUse Merkle/Blink RPC or integrate as a walletToggle on in MetaMask settings
Best forWallets & RPC providersMetaMask users who want zero setup

Merkle (Blink)

  • Broad multichain coverage (incl. Solana)
  • High throughput (25M tx/day target)
  • Lets wallets monetize order flow
  • Aimed at wallets/providers more than end-users
  • Less end-user brand recognition

MetaMask Smart Transactions

  • Zero setup — built into MetaMask
  • 99.9% tx success rate + pre-simulation
  • Multichain (ETH + 4 chains)
  • Only inside MetaMask
  • No direct rebate to you

Bottom line

Pick Merkle (Blink) for wallets & rpc providers; pick MetaMask Smart Transactions for metamask users who want zero setup.